Creating Inclusive Leadership Environments

I once watched a CEO dismiss a brilliant strategy in eight seconds. Not because it was wrong: but because it came from the quietest person in the room. The most dangerous thing about stereotypes? They're invisible until they control the decision. Think you're rational? Princeton research shows we form judgments in less than 100 milliseconds. Here's the real cost: • Breakthrough ideas die in silence because the voice was "unexpected" • Future leaders vanish behind "lack of presence" • Innovation suffocates under "needs more seasoning" The business impact is clear: Companies with diverse leadership are 70% more likely to capture new markets (HBR). But stereotypes don't just live in words. They shape careers in micro-decisions every single day. Want real change? Start here: → Pause: "What's really driving my judgment right now?" → Listen: Actively seek out the quiet voices → Structure: Use clear criteria, not gut feelings I've made these mistakes. My teams got stronger when I learned to look deeper than first impressions. 💭 When have you seen silent bias change an outcome?

Great leadership isn’t about ensuring alignment all the time. Here is why: I recently worked with a leadership team in a global company that, at first glance, seemed to be thriving. Meetings were quick, decisions were made efficiently, and everyone was on the same page. They believed this harmony meant they were operating at peak performance. But beneath the surface, something critical was missing: 🚫 innovation. Their constant agreement was stifling progress. Without diverse ideas, challenges, or healthy debate, the team was simply recycling the same thinking, overlooking new opportunities and struggling with complex problems. It was a classic case of ‘groupthink’—where everyone falls into agreement to avoid conflict or discomfort.  👇 Here’s what I did with the team: - Diagnosed the agreement cycle & TPS - Introduced psychological safety practices - Encouraged intellectual humility - Secured mechanism for diverse input integration We started worked on inclusive decision-making practices by ensuring that every voice in the room was heard. We integrated mechanisms like structured brainstorming, anonymous idea submissions, and rotating roles of idea champions to reduce bias and prevent dominant voices from overtaking discussions. 📈 The result? Not only did their decision-making improve, but their solutions became more creative and forward-thinking. Leaders, here're the takeaways: 1️⃣ If your meetings are full of "Yes, I agree," ask yourself what you might be missing. 2️⃣ Diversity of thought is your competitive advantage. 3️⃣ Teams thrive when they feel safe enough to disagree and bold enough to innovate. This is psychological safety. P.S. Do you think your team challenges each other enough? I’d love to hear your thoughts 👇

Neurodiversity 101: Making meetings more neuroinclusive Meetings are meant to bring people together to share ideas, make decisions, and build connection. Yet, for many neurodivergent colleagues and often for others too meetings can be overwhelming, confusing, or simply unproductive. Have you ever been to a meeting and wondered why you were there or what was expected of you? Whether online or in person, more inclusive meetings benefit everyone. They create clarity, structure, and safety for diverse thinkers to contribute meaningfully. Here’s how to make meetings more neuroinclusive: 1. Clarity before you start Share the purpose, agenda, timing, and who’s attending where possible in advance. Make clear if attendance is optional or essential and what preparation, if any, is expected. Sending materials early gives everyone time to process and plan. 2. Structure supports inclusion Outline how questions will be handled and what turn-taking looks like. Minute key actions and share them promptly. End by explaining what happens next. Predictability reduces anxiety and ensures accountability. Be aware of the 'quiet ones' in the room and ensure everyone can participate. 3. Inclusive communication Use clear, plain language avoid “acronym fests.” Pause regularly to check understanding and invite clarification. Remember, silence doesn’t mean disengagement; some people need more time to formulate ideas. Some people may need time after the meeting to come back with their responses too. 4. Online inclusivity Show participants how to use platform features like captions, transcripts, or chat. Encourage written contributions and offer the option to keep cameras off to reduce sensory load/allow movement/ or just not seeing your own face all the time! Provide recordings or transcripts afterwards so people can review at their own pace. 5. Make space for every voice Avoid putting people on the spot. Allow time after the meeting for those who prefer to reflect before responding. Remember: the “quiet ones” may hold the most valuable insights. **Small changes, big impact Microaggressions — such as dismissing someone’s idea or using “humour” that excludes can and do erode trust. Inclusion grows when meetings feel psychologically safe and respectful. Neuroinclusive meetings are not just a “nice to have.” This is a universal design concept in action. They are cost-effective, efficient, and fair improving engagement, retention, and creativity. When everyone can contribute in their own way, we get better decisions and stronger teams. 🟣 Inclusion isn’t about changing people. It’s about changing the conditions so people can thrive. Can you add any other ideas of what works too?

“Because you look pretty and kind, I didn’t think that you would be good at building a business.” Just recently a follower from my LinkedIn told me to my face, she did not join my community because of the way I looked (ie “beautiful, warm and kind”) and in turn she did not believe I could actually successfully build a business and be good at leading a community.  It was not until her close friend brought her to an event and hearing through her friend the huge value we brought, that she was able to fight the negative stereotype she had of me and negative impact my “look” had on her impression of me and my company.  This is a tragic realization: If our own race and gender agrees to perpetuate, encourage, and confirm these stereotypes, then how do we have any hope of breaking them within greater society? According to Harvard research, if an Asian woman is perceived and works to build her warm charisma, kindness and compassion, she is perceived as incompetent in her work.  On the other hand, if an Asian woman is perceived not as that— cold, aggressive, assertive— then she can be perceived as competent but at the expense of not being able to have warmth and kindness.  In sum, as Asian women, we’re navigating and walking an impossible balance beam of negative stereotypes forced upon us by society. The question is: how can we combat these stereotypes? Here are some first steps: 1. Name the bias out loud. Stereotypes only grow stronger when they remain unspoken. Acknowledging that these perceptions exist — even within our own communities — is the first step toward dismantling them. 2. Celebrate multidimensional leadership. We must normalize that leaders can be both warm and competent, both kind and strategic. Visibility matters — when we showcase Asian women who lead with empathy and excellence, we challenge the one-dimensional boxes we’ve been put into. 3. Hold each other accountable — with compassion. Bias isn't just external. As your story shows, it can come from peers and even friends. We need to call in, not just call out, our communities when we see these assumptions at play. Education and exposure shift mindsets far more effectively than shame. 4. Reclaim the narrative. Whether in media, business, or leadership, Asian women deserve to author their own stories. Research from the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology shows that counter-stereotypical role models can significantly reduce implicit bias. Your presence — visible, vocal, and leading with both warmth and skill — is resistance. 5. Invest in spaces that reflect and reinforce our full humanity. Whether it’s communities, teams, or networks, choose and build spaces that allow Asian women to thrive as their whole selves — not just what fits into society’s narrow expectations. The Authentic Asian is a great place to start 🙂 Only 7 spots left before enrollment closes. If you’ve been searching for your community apply now: https://lnkd.in/exy_2y63

Unlearning Stereotypes: A Leadership Responsibility In one of my recent training sessions, we explored the subtle yet powerful impact of stereotypes in our personal and professional lives. What stood out was how deeply conditioned we are—so much so that we often accept stereotypes without ever questioning them. A video we discussed highlighted the phrase: 👉 “You lost to a girl.” A seemingly casual remark, yet it reflects a mindset that not only undermines capability but also keeps inequality alive across generations. Stereotypes are not always loud or obvious—they often sit quietly in the background, influencing decisions, interactions, and opportunities: 🤔“Men are natural leaders; women are natural nurturers.” 🤔“Introverts cannot excel in client-facing roles.” 🤔“Young employees are reckless; senior employees resist change.” The danger lies in allowing these unchecked assumptions to shape culture and leadership. To move forward, leaders and professionals must take intentional steps: 1. Self-Awareness – Notice when your thoughts or language reflect a stereotype. 2. Courage to Question – Address stereotypes when they surface in teams or conversations. 3. Inclusive Practices – Create environments that reward competence and authenticity, not labels. 4. Role Modelling – Show through your leadership that potential has no gender, age, or personality boundary. True growth—personal, professional, and organizational—comes when we stop looking through the lens of bias and start looking at people for their skills, values, and potential. As professionals and leaders, what stereotype do you think we urgently need to unlearn in today’s workplace? #InclusiveLeadership #BreakTheBias #MindsetMatters

𝗢𝗡 𝗕𝗘𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗛𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗗 I was once in a meeting where I relayed an idea. I was a VP. There was another male VP in the meeting. And our boss. The meeting went on as if I didn't say anything. Then, the male VP relayed the same idea. And the boss said, "Great idea!" The oversight wasn't necessarily intended. It manifested an unconscious bias that often goes unnoticed in our daily interactions. Recognizing this is the first step toward making meaningful changes. When a woman states an idea, it may be overlooked, but everyone notices when a man repeats it. This is called the “stolen idea.” When a male coworker runs away with a woman’s idea, remind everyone it originated with her by saying something like, “Great idea! I loved it when Katie originally brought it up, and I’m glad you reiterated it.” If someone takes your idea, you can speak up for yourself by saying, “Thanks for picking up on that idea. Here’s my thought. . .” (then add something new). Ways that we can make sure women’s ideas are heard: 1. Invite other women to speak 2. Distribute speaking time equally 3. Ask to hear from women who are being interrupted and spoken over 4. Amplify other women’s ideas by repeating them and giving credit 5. Praise and showcase other women’s work 6. Create systems to distribute “office housework,” such as note-taking, in meetings 7. Share public speaking opportunities with women who have less power or privilege 8. Share pronouns In reflecting on this experience, I'm reminded of the importance of RAW leadership: Being 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗟 in acknowledging our biases and striving for equity, Being 𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗩𝗘 in amplifying and crediting ideas regardless of their source, and recognizing the 𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗧𝗛𝗬 impact of ensuring every voice is heard and valued. By adopting these practices, we can dismantle unconscious biases and create a more inclusive environment where everyone feels seen and heard. How do you ensure all voices are heard in your spaces?

New BMJ Global Health Commentary: Governing Health Systems With a Gender Lens I’m pleased to share a new BMJ Global Health commentary, written with my colleagues Aya Thabet and Anna Cocozza, on a topic that urgently needs attention: How health system governance can close—or widen—the women’s health gap. Women around the world experience, on average, nine additional years of poor health compared with men. This disparity is not just a clinical issue. It is a governance issue. For decades, health systems have relied on a narrow definition of women’s health, focusing predominantly on maternal and reproductive care. This has left significant gaps in areas such as chronic disease, mental health, menopause, autoimmune conditions, gender-based violence, and more. Our article argues that governance itself must change if we want health systems to deliver for women. Using the WHO’s Six Governance Behaviours framework, we examine how governments, regulators, and purchasers can integrate a gender lens into the rules, incentives, and decision-making processes that shape health systems. Here are some of the key insights: 1. Deliver strategy with measurable commitments Clear definitions, dedicated budgets, and accountability mechanisms across both the public and private sectors must back equity goals. 2. Build understanding through sex-disaggregated data If systems don’t collect it, they can’t govern it. Mandatory sex-disaggregated data and transparency are essential to closing gaps. 3. Enable stakeholders by aligning incentives Financing arrangements—particularly strategic purchasing—can reward equitable, women-centred care rather than perpetuating neglect. 4. Align structures through gender-responsive regulation Licensing, training, essential medicines lists, and facility standards must explicitly reflect women’s health needs across the life course. 5. Foster relations with meaningful partnerships Women’s organisations, professional associations, and patient groups are indispensable partners in designing governance arrangements that work. 6. Nurture trust with strong accountability systems Women must have access to safe, responsive grievance and redress mechanisms—and regulators must consistently enforce protections. Why this matters Health systems are not gender-neutral. Without intentional design, the rules and incentives that govern them will continue to reproduce inequalities. By applying a gender lens to governance, we can reposition women’s health as a core system priority, not a side issue—and build accountability for equitable, respectful, high-quality care. Governing Health Systems With a Gender Lens BMJ Global Health – Clarke, Thabet & Cocozza https://lnkd.in/dwXNka4a Join the conversation #WomensHealth #GenderEquity #HealthSystems #GlobalHealth #HealthGovernance #HealthPolicy #UniversalHealthCoverage #UHC #DigitalHealth #HealthReform #HealthEquity #Accountability #Regulation #StrategicPurchasing #BMJGlobalHealth

DEI Rollbacks: A Step Backward—But We Can Keep Moving Forward Toni Morrison once said, “The very serious function of racism is distraction. It keeps you from doing your work. It keeps you explaining over and over and over again, your reason for being.” That is exactly what is happening with the current administration’s attacks on DEI programs. They’ve co-opted the language of equity to claim “reverse racism,” falsely asserting that they are “ending illegal discrimination” and “restoring merit-based opportunity.” But the underlying message is clear: a manufactured narrative that suggests DEI programs take opportunities away from deserving individuals, implying that those who don’t fit the dominant identity are somehow unqualified. Let’s be clear—DEI is not about excluding talent. It is about expanding access. These programs create pathways for historically excluded communities—including women, veterans, and individuals with disabilities—who possess the skills, qualifications, and, in many cases, are overqualified but would have otherwise been overlooked due to systemic barriers. As a Non Profit Executive, I’ve led  successful strategies that fostered equitable pathways and true inclusion. And if organizations want to thrive, we don’t need less of these strategies—we need more. The facts don’t lie: Studies consistently show that diverse teams drive more innovation, make better decisions, and yield higher profits. Yet, despite this evidence, we are witnessing a rollback of DEI efforts across industries. So what can we do? Even in the face of these rollbacks, organizations can continue advancing equity in meaningful ways: ✅ Embed DEI into core business strategy. Move beyond performative gestures—ensure inclusion is a fundamental part of how decisions are made and who gets a seat at the table. ✅ Reframe DEI as a driver of innovation. Position diversity, equity, and inclusion as competitive advantages, emphasizing their proven impact on creativity, problem-solving, and business success. ✅ Prioritize inclusive hiring practices. Implement skills-based hiring, equitable advancement opportunities, and mentorship programs to cultivate diverse leadership pipelines. ✅ Leverage Employee Resource Groups (ERGs). Support and fund ERGs to empower employees, foster belonging, and create spaces for underrepresented voices. ✅ Hold leadership accountable. Ensure executives and decision-makers are actively championing equity efforts, not just delegating them. DEI is not about checking boxes—it’s about unlocking potential. Despite the distractions and political rhetoric, we must remain committed to building workplaces where talent thrives, opportunity expands, and inclusion fuels innovation. How is your organization maintaining its commitment to DEI in these times? Let’s keep this conversation going. 👇🏾 #DEI #Equity #Leadership #Inclusion #Innovation

In my inclusive leadership workshops, there’s always a moment when it clicks for leaders—the instant they realise that inclusion isn’t a moral initiative but the foundation of employee engagement. That “aha” comes when they see inclusion through the lens of human motivation: safety, belonging, esteem, and purpose. When framed this way, DEI stops feeling like something they have to do and starts feeling like something they want to do. When framed as engagement, leaders understand that inclusion isn’t separate from performance—it is performance. It’s how we create the conditions where everyone contributes their best. And this framing isn’t just powerful in leadership training—it’s a strategic tool for DEI more broadly. By grounding inclusion in universal human needs, organisations can move beyond awareness and compliance toward cultures that actively motivate and engage all individuals—both under-represented and dominant group members. This approach provides a shared language that unites, rather than divides, tempering backlash and resistance, and making DEI a driver of engagement, innovation, and sustainable performance.