Here's a curiosity: the PS5 and Xbox Series consoles spent years in cross-gen territory, with relatively few game studios choosing to abandon the significant PS4 and Xbox One install base in favour of the new machines. Yet for the Switch 2, the tap for Switch 1 development was quickly turned off, with full-fat Switch 2 game production well underway by the time the console reached the one-year mark. Why?
That was the excellent question posed by DF supporter Yotsuya in DF Direct Q&A #277, who wanted to know what special sauce Nintendo has employed to seemingly skip the inevitable cross-gen period and move straight onto the new machine.
It's all about the relative leverage that each console maker has over their respective markets. In the case of Sony and Microsoft, despite a healthy (or not-so-healthy) stable of first-party studios, the majority of game sales lies with third-party developers who want to maximise their return on investment - which means targeting current and last-gen machines together.
For Nintendo, the situation is reversed, with a majority of game sales on the platform coming from Nintendo itself - and that makes it a lot easier to switch over wholesale. They're willing to take the short-term hit on game sales for Switch 1 in order to ensure that the Switch 2, likely their flagship platform for the best part of the next decade, is as successful as possible, reaping the benefits later down the line.
It also means that their Switch 2 games are genuinely designed for that platform exclusively, leading to higher-quality results and more daring features - it's hard to imagine Mario Kart World's increased player counts and larger stages scaling down to Switch 1 hardware, for example.
And if Nintendo stops producing Switch 1 games and exclusively pushes Switch 2, then that helps kickstart the new console generation, pushing more players to upgrade - and thus allowing third-party game developers to make the same rapid transition with confidence that the new system's install base will grow rapidly.
This truncated cross-gen period is just one element of Nintendo's full-throated belief in traditional console generations too, and it bookends neatly with its reticence to discount games after launch, its continued production of physical games and its focus on exclusive titles. Microsoft and Sony don't have the same luxury, and as we can see, their entire business has changed as a result.
[source youtube.com]





Comments 5
Multiple choice option in that poll would be nice.
It's funny this is now apparently a pro for Switch 2 when before in past gens Nintendo were always criticized for how hard they dropped the old console. Besides low effort Wii ports there was rarely any notable release a year or two after the new console came out (besides Japan) vs the PS2 still getting games into like 2010.
That’s amazing of Nintendo, sticking to their guns, that is a better move, I think Sony could have pulled it off, I’m certain that Sony should read this and not rush into ps6, wait till time is good, if it doesn’t get good, then if possible adjust their strategy and release a ps5 revision one more time and perhaps a ps5 handheld
From a practical standpoint, the switch 1 hardware specs are so far behind, it’s not really feasible to develop a large scale game in 2026 on the hardware. They were underpowered when it launched in 2017, but justified it with the hybrid setup.
I think it's less traditional than before as almost all Switch 1 games are playable on the Switch 2. Also focussing on just their new console makes it possible to keep development times short and keeps development cost lower.
@SteamyDeck yeah and if you look at them as a generation behind, the PS3 to PS4 had a shorter cross gen period so it might be that the real comparison is to the Switch 3
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...