Sign in to view Brendan’s full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Sign in to view Brendan’s full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Greater Chicago Area
Sign in to view Brendan’s full profile
Brendan can introduce you to 1 people at Growth Sprints
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
53K followers
500+ connections
Sign in to view Brendan’s full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
View mutual connections with Brendan
Brendan can introduce you to 1 people at Growth Sprints
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
View mutual connections with Brendan
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Sign in to view Brendan’s full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Services
Articles by Brendan
-
Is ChatGPT locking out new brands? The State of AI Search | August 2026
Is ChatGPT locking out new brands? The State of AI Search | August 2026
Real quick: this is the first edition of The State of AI Search! It'd mean the WORLD to me if you left a comment here…
31
22 Comments -
24 Career Tips from 15 Years in the Game (Plus, a BIG Announcement!)Feb 22, 2021
24 Career Tips from 15 Years in the Game (Plus, a BIG Announcement!)
Over the past 15 years, I’ve held the titles of — Teacher — Assistant principal — SEO specialist — SEO Director (twice)…
104
34 Comments -
I quit my dream job. ❤️Jan 10, 2020
I quit my dream job. ❤️
Part 1: My "Day" Job After 10 years, Brendan the teacher was fed up, exhausted, and (if he was honest with you), a bit…
84
29 Comments -
3 Words That Changed My BusinessSep 18, 2019
3 Words That Changed My Business
The photo above is Ryan Fischer. Ryan is a monster.
16
4 Comments
Activity
53K followers
-
Brendan Hufford posted thisEvery number on our content calendar was round. 1 blog a week. 6 posts a month. That should've been the first red flag. Round numbers come from habit. I asked why 1 blog instead of 3. Nobody knew. I asked why 6 posts instead of 4, or 12, or whatever. Nobody knew. The answer was always some version of "that's just what we do." Or even worse "bring data that shows we can make a change." Cool but if we didn't arrive at our current strategy via data, why do we need data to change? Meanwhile the team was COOKED. Everybody working harder than the year before. Leadership convinced that if we just added more volume, the numbers would finally move. They didn't. They never do. The problem is when people are tired, and leadership thinks more volume is the answer, they're not willing to give up volume in one area to do more of another. It's a trap (admiral ackbar voice). You start out doing random acts of marketing, it's chaotic, so you build processes to survive the chaos. Good instinct. Then the process outlives the reason you built it, and now you're just checking boxes. Six of these. Two of those. Forever. Nobody questions it because questioning it feels like slowing down, and slowing down feels like losing. ⚡️ Test it next week: Pick anything on your calendar right now and ask why that number and not a different one. If you can't answer in one sentence, you're checkbox marketing. And that might be working fine right now, but know you're not gonna be able to change when it doesn't.
-
Brendan Hufford shared thisRamp's the darling of B2B marketing right now, but when it comes to AI search, one of their competitors is close to overtaking them. Here’s how 👇 Visibility: 74.4% vs. Ramp's 78.6%. Share of Voice: 11% vs. 11.6%. Sentiment: 90.7% positive, actually edging out Ramp's 89.3%. The competitor? Brex. Not a big surprise, but it did blow me away how differently Brex does things despite holding even with Ramp… Both companies run best [category] platform posts. Ramp leans more on editorial (blogs). Brex leans more on solutions pages. 2 things Brex does that are unique: 1. They DO NOT TALK ABOUT RAMP. It’s like fight club but for AP automation, haha. In their listicles that get cited most, they never talk about Ramp. (or almost never - 1 of 14 cited pages). They do talk about them elsewhere, but I thought that was interesting. 2. Their pricing page has the same endless list of checkmarks for different plans that Ramp does. But they put it under dropdowns by section versus having it all visible. Not a huge difference, but it does show up in 7.2% of total citations, vs. 1.6% for Ramp's. - Ramp gets a TON of (justified) hype for all of their brand work and brilliant marketing. That’s why it’s super interesting that, when it comes to AEO and AI search, Brex is right there with them. ⚡ PS - This is a cool example of the "Endorsed" part of my F-A-M-E framework for AI search. When it comes to AI search, brilliant marketing stunts have less impact than getting endorsed by the rest of the internet.
-
Brendan Hufford shared thisWe hadn't even published half the content plan and their AEO visibility score had already jumped 36 points. Here's the strategy that did it (it’s only 3 steps) 👇 1. Client strategy always starts with customers & the teams who talk to them. My 3S Strategy: talking to sales, success and support. Not just about their category, but about the status quo and misconceptions, too. As well as account expansion, churn, and all the other things no keyword tool is going to tell you. 2. Audited their current state based on the approach I use to explain AEO to CEOs: F-A-M-E - Found - Are we showing up in category searches? - Ahead - Where are we showing up in those replies? - Matched - Is what AI says about us accurate? - Endorsed - Does AI actually know what we’re best for? 3. Capture demand (the part most teams skip) Everybody, including me, wants to talk about demos and signups. Those went up too. But the bigger shift was upstream of that - people who found the site through an AI answer, not a Google search, were sticking around long enough to hand over an email. So we made a grand slam offer - something so good they couldn’t say no. ⚡️ PS - Based on 2025 and 2026 data, 94% of your buyers use AI search when researching your category. If you aren’t actively paying attention to this, your competitors are.
-
Brendan Hufford shared thisA client's content lead DM'ed me last week asking if she should be worried. Told her yes, but not for the reason she thought... AI search doesn't move in quarters. It moves in weeks. 1. Reddit lost 86% of its ChatGPT citations in seven days. 2. ChatGPT might be locking out new brands PLUS 5 more huge moves in the AI search world. I used to think that I could just keep my eye on the feed and I'd keep up. Not true. So I put together The State of AI Search. A regular breakdown of major moves in the AEO world, what each one means, and what to do about it before your competitor gets there first. This is the FIRST edition so it'd mean the world to me if you left a comment! ⚡️ PS - Forward this to whoever's supposed to be catching this stuff on your team. Get them caught up in under 5min. Or copy/paste it into Claude for a summary. I won't judge. 😉Is ChatGPT locking out new brands? The State of AI Search | August 2026Is ChatGPT locking out new brands? The State of AI Search | August 2026Brendan Hufford
-
Brendan Hufford shared thisThis dashboard took me 30 minutes and is gonna be worth at least $1M to my business in the next 12 months. Wanna know how I know? Because not having it has cost me easily $100k over the last few years. Here’s what I mean: The thing that's cost me the most money in five years of running Growth Sprints is communication. Nobody warns you about this when you go solo. I spent a decade in education - I can build a curriculum, run a classroom, survive a fire drill with 400 high schoolers. I can also build some really amazing marketing programs *and* the content to support it. But 14 clients at once? The updates slip. The work ships. The Slack channel goes quiet. And in that quiet, your client is staring at their inbox thinking, "what am I even paying for?" Last quarter, a client I genuinely love sat me down and told me exactly that. The deliverables were good. But updates were inconsistent, response times were slow, and they were picking up work I should've handled. I’ve been hearing it for years and tried everything to fix it. Zapier reminders, automated updated with Claude, hiring an executive assistant and tons of other stuff. Clients have said it. My wife has said it. I've said it to myself, refreshing Slack at 11pm wondering which update I forgot. But discipline isn't the fix when the real problem is that the answers live in six different places - Slack threads, Asana, call transcripts, my inbox, a Profound dashboard, and (worst of all) my head. So I stopped trying to become a more organized person. I built a tool instead. I call it Sprint HQ. One portal per client: → What shipped (pulled from Slack) → What's coming next sprint (Slack) → What's in progress (Asana) → AI visibility trend (Profound) → A scoreboard: what I owe them, what they owe me I designed the entire thing in Lovable in an afternoon - my brand colors, my fonts, the dumb little retro racing stripe I love. Right now I'm wiring it to my real Asana and Slack so the weekly update basically writes itself and clients can check status without ever having to ask. 10+ years of "Brendan's a great marketer, but..." and the fix wasn't becoming a different person. It was finally being able to build the thing myself, the same week I admitted I needed it. ⚡️ PS - Should I share the Lovable prompt that I used to create it? Let me know. Oh and if you want a preview of the dashboard itself: https://lnkd.in/eDf4BsAj #LovablePartner
-
Brendan Hufford posted this"Virtually everything that made human content well-researched, interesting, and original can be done using AI." - a Director of Content Marketing Are you... are you fcking kidding me? Here's the AI hill I'll die on: AI research is genuinely better than what most humans do. I use it for every single one of my research reports, both for Growing Up and what I create for Growth Sprints clients. AI eats human research alive. But the leap from "AI researches well" to "AI can do everything that makes content original and interesting" is CRAZY. We've lost the plot. Research and originality are fundamentally different skills. Research is the foundation of taste. It is not taste. The 4D framework for taste is my answer to the whole "AI is coming for your job" panic: 1. Decide what you actually want to say. 2. Duplicate the people already saying it well. Blindly. Shamelessly. 3. Decode the rules underneath why it works. 4. Defy the rules AI sucks at steps 1, 3 and 4. You gotta do that part (if you want to stand out). The companies I work with that are actually winning at content right now don't (only) have better research. They have a point of view that came from operating, from shipping, from being wrong in public and adjusting. The bottleneck in content marketing wasn't research quality. It was having something original to say. And the better AI gets at research, the MORE originality becomes the differentiator, not less.
-
Brendan Hufford posted thisA company sitting on $8 million in funding asked me to run their AEO & SEO. I told him not to hire me yet. Building a really cool app in a new space. Solid pre-seed round from real investors. 6 people on the team and 100+ paying users already. Good start. They got on a call with me wanting to talk AEO strategy. We chatted for about 10min and I kept nodding along to how they said they were approaching things. So I asked them straight up: is speed the problem, or is budget the problem? If it's speed, hire me. I'll move faster than you can while you're also running paid and product and everything else. If it's budget, run it yourself. You already know what you're doing. The "schema" and "URL structure" stuff people charge five figures to gatekeep isn't complicated. It's mostly old-school SEOs turning a human problem into a website problem because website problems are the only ones they know how to solve. "So what would I actually be paying for?" they said. "Speed. Forty revenue-driving pages live in 10 weeks instead of 10 months, that's me. If you have the time, save your money." That's the version of Growth Sprints I actually want to run. Not one where I try to convince smart people they need me based on fear and fomo. One where they come back because they need an expert and want to move fast. ⚡️ PS - if a consultant can't tell you when you don't need them, don't trust them to tell you when you do.
-
Brendan Hufford shared thisThe AI bro math in this is so embarrassing: 1. You hired THREE people at 180k? You paid them 60k each? So the problem is you hired 3 junior people with little oversight. 2. You are now paying the new person 40k and that includes tooling? Who are you hiring? 3. We’re measuring success by output? OH LORD. Checkbox marketing-land here we come. I could go on. All of these “l fired my whole marketing team” posts are an epic self-owns. Just say you’re bad at hiring or don't understand marketing. And what happened to the old 'extreme ownership' thing every founder was hot for a few years ago? PS - Have some respect. If my old boss started making posts that said I sucked at my job 2 years ago, I'd be... well, I'd probably be pretty sad. And that'd wreck my day. And maybe I deserve that, but these people don't. YOU are the one who hired them, guy. And you're the one who grossly underpaid them. PPS - and mother of god "hire for output" is literally the WORST way to hire for marketing.
-
Brendan Hufford shared thisConfession: I gave up trying to predict which platform gets hit next. Here's the 4-part system I run instead 👇 Early 2025 - Wikipedia dominates AI search citations “We need a Wikipedia strategy” echoes through board rooms. Late 2025 - Reddit becomes the dominant social citation in AI search “We need a Reddit strategy” Jan 2026 - YouTube overtakes Reddit “We need a YouTube strategy” Feb 2026 - LinkedIn becomes a top cited source “We need a LinkedIn strategy” Sigh…. See the pattern? If you built your AI search strategy around some other platform (YouTube, LinkedIn, Reddit) specifically, you built it on sand. Instead of chasing whichever platform had a good week, I built FAME. 1. Found - are you on the list AI recommends? 2. Ahead - where on that list? 3. Matched - is what AI says about you still true? 4. Endorsed - is the rest of the internet recommending you, or just mentioning you? It works no matter what ChatGPT does next Tuesday. -- If you want to go deeper, Josh Blyskal at Profound pulled 200M ChatGPT prompts across 20 social domains. When Reddit's citations cratered on August 14th, the share of searches asking for a specific site by name jumped from 0.83% to 7.38%. Reddit was still the most requested site in those searches. But only 10.7% of those runs actually cited it. Sooooooomebody at ChatGPT is turning a dial somewhere between retrieval and citation. That's a different problem than Reddit falling apart, BUT it's the one you should actually be tracking. ⚡ PS - These platforms all still work, but do them FOR that platform, not solely for AEO. Do LinkedIn for LinkedIn. Do Reddit for Reddit. And for the love of tiny baby b2b jesus, do NOT publish 8 ai slop videos to YouTube each day to influence citations (yes I really saw a company doing this).
-
Brendan Hufford liked thisBrendan Hufford liked thisWhich Memphis Zoo option do you like best? Option 1, 2, 3 or 4? It has been a dream of mine to create a logo and brand identity system for a Zoo. So when Memphis Zoo reached out in a comment asking me to create a new logo for them, my jaw dropped. What started as a comment turned into a full brand identity project that I’ve been working on for the past year. We thought it would be valuable to get your opinions before we picked the final logo. We want to make sure that the logo resonates with Memphis Zoo’s audience. I definitely have my favorite and you can probably guess based on the video which one I’m most excited about, but what’s truly important is what the consumer thinks. I’ll also post still images of each direction so that you can flip through them in a carousel. Thanks for taking the time to read this, and for taking the time to share your thoughts and opinions. You guys are amazing!
-
Brendan Hufford liked thisBrendan Hufford liked thisI was an undrafted rookie with a $2,000 signing bonus when Tom Brady walked up and introduced himself. It was my first day in New England, I was 21, and I was still digging through my bag making sure I had my notebook and everything else for meetings. I felt somebody walking toward me and I just kept getting more flustered, and then he got close and said, hey Kenny, I'm Tom. I was too star struck to get much of anything back. What I found out later was that the whole building did it. The vets learned the rookies before we ever showed up, where we went to school, all of that. And it was our job as rookies to do the same, that was the culture. If the best player in the world knows the guy with the least amount of money invested in him, you start believing you're supposed to be there. After I left New England to play in Indianapolis I made it my thing to learn the names of everyone in the building, front office to custodial staff, because someone did that for me. The person vacuuming the carpet after practice matters the same to me as the guy under center.
Experience & Education
-
Growth Sprints
******* * **** ** ****** **** * ****
-
*** ** ***************
******** ** *********
-
******* **
** ** *********
-
****** *******
****** ******* ********* ******** ********** *********** ********* ******** *********** ********* undefined
-
********* ***** **********
******** ****** *********** ********** *** *************** *******
View Brendan’s full experience
See their title, tenure and more.
Welcome back
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
New to LinkedIn? Join now
or
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Licenses & Certifications
Publications
-
My Experience with the 10 Rules of Brand Building (Part 4)
Medium
See publicationI’m so freaking excited for our 4th installment of the 10 rules of brand building.
As always, you can read the full article at the thehundreds.com
And here’s the lowdown.
Stay HUNGRY. Not thirsty.
Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.
Let that sink in a bit.
Recommendations received
27 people have recommended Brendan
Join now to viewView Brendan’s full profile
-
See who you know in common
-
Get introduced
-
Contact Brendan directly
Other similar profiles
-
Pamela Zapata
Pamela Zapata
- Inc 5000 Fastest Growing Businesses 2025<br>- Forbes Next 1000 Honoree 2021<br>- Business Insider | Top YouTube Talent Managers, 2020<br>- Business Insider | Top 15 Talent Managers for Micro Influencers, 2020<br><br>Experienced professional with 15+ years of industry experience and a demonstrated history of working in talent / influencer relations, integrated marketing, casting, production, and content development.
7K followersLos Angeles, CA -
Jessica Allen
Jessica Allen
Social Yoda Consulting(P/R, Media,Communications)
5K followersJackson, TN
Explore more posts
-
Terry C Power - Ranking You Better
Legal Marketing Association… • 6K followers
Hot take: Social doesn’t directly rank your site—but it powers the signals that do. How social fuels SEO (indirectly): - Earned links: Amplified content gets picked up by journalists, bloggers, and newsletters. - Branded demand: Social builds familiarity that increases branded searches (a strong ranking moat). - Entity/E-E-A-T: Consistent author profiles, real experts, and mentions strengthen your entity. - Faster discovery: Shares create crawlable paths that speed up indexation. - Better SERP performance: Brand familiarity can lift CTR and dwell. - Topic intelligence: Social listening surfaces questions and language users actually search. - Local lift: UGC, check-ins, and community buzz drive citations and reviews. A simple playbook: - Publish one linkable asset/month (data, tool, template). Seed it in relevant communities. - Co-create with SMEs/creators; they bring distribution and credibility. - Repurpose natively (short clips, carousels) with a clear path to the canonical page. - Nail OG/Twitter cards; track with UTM. Respond fast to early traction (journalist lists ready). - Encourage branded queries in CTAs (“Google: Brand + Topic Guide”). - Bring social proof on-page (quotes, embeds) to boost engagement signals. - Measure, prune, double down. Track this: - Branded search volume (GSC) - Referring domains and earned mentions - Indexation speed and crawl stats - SERP CTR for priority terms - Social-to-link conversion rate What’s one social-to-SEO move that actually moved the needle for you? #sultanofSEO
-
Michael Margolies
NextGrad • 2K followers
🚨 THIS SHOULD SHAKE EVERY HIGHER ED MARKETER 🚨 This isn’t a small inefficiency. This is a system-wide failure. Thats why NextGrad is changing the game. We don’t chase clicks. We don’t rely on algorithms. We don’t gamble on whether your audience is real. We go where reality actually exists. Real students. Real schools. Real moments. 👉 Your first impression becomes discovery, not a skipped ad. NextGrad is where students meet you first!
2
-
Gabriella S.
Level343.com • 2K followers
It’s always fascinating when people declare SEO dead while the companies redefining search are quietly hiring SEO talent for $400K+. The interface may be evolving, but discoverability, authority, and structured information are still the foundation of how information surfaces online. I’ve always approached it as a marketing strategist first, SEO has simply been one of the most effective channels for understanding and shaping how information is found. AI doesn’t change that. It expands it.
11
-
Liana Ling
Power Up Strategy • 7K followers
"You are eligible for a FREE review of your ad account" oH aMaZiNg. ExAcTlY wHaT i NeEdEd. Nothing says “let’s improve performance” like someone who’s never run your business, doesn’t understand your funnel, and suggests: • “Try broader targeting” • “Increase budget” • “Use Advantage+” • “Have you considered more video?” HARD PASS.
1
-
Alex Sanfilippo
PodMatch • 26K followers
Cumulus Media and Signal Hill Insights released a podcasting report that I found valuable, so I wanted to share part of it. What percentage of podcast consumers watch podcasts vs listen? Only 8% of podcast consumers WATCH podcasts! The other 92% are listening only. However, podcast consumers discover podcasts via YouTube 45% of the time. (That's because it's the world's most intelligent search engine.) The takeaway for podcasters is this: #1. It's highly unlikely that people will ever watch your podcast. #2. If you do produce video, the real benefit is that your podcast will get discovered by more people. (Who will then go to their favorite listening app to tune in.)
53
26 Comments -
Levi Steede
Adfluent B.V. • 8K followers
Most advertisers treat ABO vs CBO like picking a favorite sports team. Here's the thing - it's not about which one is "better." It's about using the right tool for the right situation. Use ABO when: → You can afford 2-3x your target CPA per ad set → You trust your creative strategy → You want fast, clear data on what works → You need full control over scaling winners Use CBO when: → You're conservative with spend → Unsure what winning angles will be → Testing new products, markets, or audiences → You need Meta to filter out poor performers Here's our approach: We start most accounts with CBO for creative testing. Let Meta do the heavy lifting of finding winners. Once we see consistent performance and even spend distribution across multiple creatives, we graduate to ABO. Why? Because ABO lets me scale winners aggressively while maintaining full control over budget allocation. The biggest mistake I see? People treating this like a religious debate instead of a strategic decision. Let me know your thoughts on this never-ending debate 👇🏻
22
-
Regina M. Noriega
Tmigen Media • 17K followers
𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗱𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗱. 𝗜𝘁 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻’𝘁. It dies on the profile. Here’s what we see with clients over and over: Their posts get traction. Senior people click through. And then... nothing happens. No follow. No DM. No conversion. Because their profile tells the wrong story. 360Brew doesn’t just rank posts. It classifies people. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝘂𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝗴𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗺 (𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝘂𝘆𝗲𝗿𝘀) 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆. Here’s the mistake that we see all the time: ❌ 🚀 2× SaaS Founder | B2B Growth | $XM ARR | Ex-[Logo] | Scaling Relentlessly | MBA | Let’s Talk The credentials are there but It’s also invisible. It tells the algorithm 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 about: - who you’re relevant to - what problem you solve - why someone should follow you Now compare it to this: ✅ Predictable pipeline for B2B businesses built on expertise | Operator-led Same person. Very different outcome. One profile signals credentials. The other signals usefulness. And in the current algorithm, usefulness wins. This is the part most people miss: If LinkedIn can’t quickly understand who you’re for, it can’t confidently distribute your content. So even good posts get buried. Not because they’re bad. But because the profile breaks the loop. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝘃𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘀𝗹𝗼𝘄𝗹𝘆 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗿.
85
44 Comments -
Eric Richmond
CiteMetrix • 6K followers
The $1 Billion Budget Shift: CMOs are betting big on GEO in 2026. We’re seeing a massive pivot in marketing spend. Traditional SEO isn’t enough anymore when your customers are asking ChatGPT or Perplexity for recommendations instead of scrolling through blue links. Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is the new frontier. But you can't optimize what you can't measure. If you're still only tracking Google rankings, you're missing the conversation AI is having about your brand. Are you being cited? Is the sentiment positive? Are you losing share of voice to a competitor who optimized for the LLMs? We built CiteMetrix to give you the data Google Search Console doesn't: - ModelScore™: Your overall visibility across the top AI platforms. - Citation Tracking: Real-time monitoring of brand mentions. - Sentiment Analysis: How AI actually characterizes your products. The shift is happening now. Don't let your brand become invisible in the AI search era. Check your ModelScore today: https://citemetrix.com
3
-
Andreas Dolleschal
Smargasy, Inc. • 2K followers
Your client campaigns are dying at import because you skipped the systematic checkpoint that prevents 90% of GoHighLevel failures. The missing piece? Implementation validation before deployment. Most agencies treat GoHighLevel like a plug-and-play solution. They import snapshots, flip the switch, and wonder why automations break three weeks later. Client leads start slipping through cracks, and campaigns collapse. After implementing GoHighLevel across dozens of agency clients, the pattern is clear. Successful deployments follow a pre-flight validation framework that most skip entirely. Here's the systematic checkpoint process I use: Data Flow Mapping: Before importing any snapshot, map every lead touchpoint from entry to conversion. Document where your client's process differs from the snapshot assumptions. A real estate client's 48-hour response window isn't the same as a dental office's same-day booking requirement. Integration Stress Test: Test every third-party connection in a sandbox environment. Your CRM sync, email deliverability, and webhook responses need validation before going live. One broken integration cascades into campaign-wide failures. Rollback Procedures: Document your exact reversion process before deployment. When something breaks at 2 AM (and it will), you need a systematic path back to working state. The agencies that follow this validation framework see 85% fewer post-launch issues. They maintain client retention rates above industry standard. This implementation validation process eliminates the most common failure patterns. The specific testing protocols prevent the breakdowns that kill campaigns three weeks after launch. #GoHighLevel #MarketingAutomation #AgencyOperations #DigitalMarketing #SystematicGrowth
2
2 Comments -
Meg Clarke
Clapping Dog Media LLC • 6K followers
Case Study: From SEO Retainer → Real Results (That Last) A landscaping company came to me after years of paying for SEO that never really moved the needle. Their site ranked on page one for some keywords—but leads were inconsistent, and they were tired of relying on agencies to “keep it going.” They didn’t need more rankings. They needed a system they could own. 1️⃣ Fix the Foundations We started with a full SEO + technical audit: Fixed crawl + indexing errors Strengthened internal links Added local + FAQ schema Clarified on-page strategy Within 6 weeks, traffic stabilized and they reappeared in local map packs + AI overviews. 2️⃣ Build Their AI Advantage Once visibility was solid, we built them a custom GPT Search Center trained on their: Brand voice + keywords FAQ + blog structure Client questions for instant content creation Now, their internal team handles SEO + content confidently 🥂Results: +34% qualified local traffic in 60 days Featured in AI tools like Perplexity + SGE Content production 3x faster Because real SEO success isn’t renting visibility. It’s owning it.
33
18 Comments
Explore top content on LinkedIn
Find curated posts and insights for relevant topics all in one place.
View top content