Request Types

{"Jul 2025 - Dec 2025":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 88.7% of the search warrants received.&nbsp;<br>\n<\/p>\n<p>The number above includes search warrants directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the second half of 2025, we received two search warrants directed at Dropbox Sign/Dropbox Fax and one search warrant for DocSend.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jan 2025 - Jun 2025":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 85.3% of the search warrants received.<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 11.7% of the search warrants we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 12% of the affected Dropbox users identified in search warrants we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include search warrants directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the first half of 2025, we received 6 search warrants directed at DropboxSign and 2 search warrants directed at DocSend.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2024 - Dec 2024":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 81% of the search warrants received.<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.&nbsp;7% of the search warrants we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 12% of the affected Dropbox users identified in search warrants we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include search warrants directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the second half of 2024, we received 1 search warrant directed to DocSend.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jan 2024 - Jun 2024":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 78.6% of the search warrants received.<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 11.5% of the search warrants we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 13.5% of the affected Dropbox users identified in search warrants we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include search warrants directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the first half of 2024, we received 1 search warrant directed to DropboxSign/DropboxFax and 1 search warrant directed to DocSend.<\/p>\n","Jul 2023 - Dec 2023":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 77.1% of the search warrants received.<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 10.7% of the search warrants we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 11.1% of the affected Dropbox users identified in search warrants we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<br>\n<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include search warrants directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the relevant half, we did not receive any search warrants directed to Dropbox subsidiaries.<\/p>\n","Jan 2023 - Jun 2023":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 72.2% of the search warrants received.<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 12% of the search warrants we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 16% of the affected Dropbox users identified in search warrants we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include search warrants directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the relevant half, we received 1 warrant directed to Dropbox Sign/Dropbox Fax.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2022 - Dec 2022":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 69.6% of the search warrants received.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 12% of the search warrants we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 18.8% of the affected Dropbox users identified in search warrants we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2022 - Jun 2022":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 68.5% of the search warrants received.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 11.4% of the search warrants we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 15.3% of the affected Dropbox users identified in search warrants we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2021 - Dec 2021":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 74.9% of the search warrants received.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 11.7% of the search warrants we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 14.6% of the affected Dropbox users identified in search warrants we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2021 - Jun 2021":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 89.6% of the search warrants received.<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 19.7% of the search warrants we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 19.3% of the affected Dropbox users identified in search warrants we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2020 - Dec 2020":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 90.9% of the search warrants received.<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 16.4% of the search warrants we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 16.1% of the affected Dropbox users identified in search warrants we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jan 2020 - Jun 2020":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 89.5% of the search warrants received.<br>\n<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 19.2% of the search warrants we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 21% of the affected Dropbox users identified in search warrants we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2019 - Dec 2019":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 88.04% of the search warrants received.<\/p>\n<p><br>\nWhen Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 33.7% of the search warrants we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 33% of the affected Dropbox users identified in search warrants we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2019 - Jun 2019":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 84.5% of the search warrants received.<\/p>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 26.1% of the search warrants we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 29.8% of the affected Dropbox users identified in search warrants we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2018 - Dec 2018":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n<p>We received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 26.1% of the search warrants we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 29.8% of the Dropbox users named in a search warrant of the request for their information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2018 - Jun 2018":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n<p>We received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 30.1% of the search warrants we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 24.2% of the Dropbox users named in a search warrant of the request for their information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2017 - Dec 2017":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n<p>Between July and December 2017, we received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 39.5% of the search warrants we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 19.9% of the Dropbox users named in a search warrant of the request for their information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2017 - Jun 2017":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice, of the users whose content we provided to law enforcement.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Between January and June 2017, we received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 45.4% of the search warrants we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 45.1% of the Dropbox users named in a search warrant of the request for their information.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2016 - Dec 2016":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice, of the users whose content we provided to law enforcement.<\/p>\n<p>Between July and December 2016, we received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 32.4% of the search warrants we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 25.6% of the Dropbox users named in a search warrant of the request for their information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2016 - Jun 2016":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n<p>Between January and June 2016, we received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 39.9% of the search warrants we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 46.5% of the Dropbox users named in a search warrant of the request for their information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2015 - Dec 2015":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n","Jan 2015 - Jun 2015":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n","Jul 2014 - Dec 2014":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n","Jan 2014 - Jun 2014":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n","Jan 2013 - Dec 2013":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n","Jan 2012 - Dec 2012":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n"}

{"Jul 2025 - Dec 2025":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 83.6% of the subpoenas received.<br>\n<\/p>\n<p>The number above includes subpoenas for all Dropbox products. In the second half of 2025, we received six subpoenas for Dropbox Sign/Dropbox Fax and five subpoenas directed for Dropbox DocSend.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jan 2025 - Jun 2025":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 83.6% of the subpoenas received.<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 8.6% of the subpoenas we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 7.7% of the affected Dropbox users identified in subpoenas we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include subpoenas directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the first half of 2025, we received 5 subpoenas directed to Dropbox Sign/Dropbox Fax, 3 subpoenas directed to DocSend, and 3 subpoenas directed to FormSwift.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2024 - Dec 2024":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 82% of the subpoenas received.<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 7% of the subpoenas we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 7.5% of the affected Dropbox users identified in subpoenas we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include subpoenas directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the second half of 2024, we received 7 subpoenas directed to Dropbox Sign/Dropbox Fax, 1 subpoena directed to DocSend, and 3 subpoenas directed to FormSwift.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jan 2024 - Jun 2024":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 80.8% of the subpoenas received.<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 9.6% of the subpoenas we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 8.1% of the affected Dropbox users identified in subpoenas we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include subpoenas directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the first half of 2024, we received 1 subpoena directed to Dropbox Sign/Dropbox Fax, 1 subpoena directed to DocSend, and 1 subpoena directed to FormSwift.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2023 - Dec 2023":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 81.5% of the subpoenas received.<br>\n<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 9.3% of the subpoenas we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 9.6% of the affected Dropbox users identified in subpoenas we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include subpoenas directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the relevant half, we received 3 subpoenas directed to Dropbox Sign/Dropbox Fax and 2 subpoenas directed to DocSend.<\/p>\n","Jan 2023 - Jun 2023":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 81.6% of the subpoenas received.<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 6.4% of the subpoenas we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 6% of the affected Dropbox users identified in subpoenas we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include subpoenas directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the relevant half, we received 1 subpoena directed to Dropbox Sign/Dropbox Fax, 1 subpoena directed to DocSend, and two subpoenas directed to FormSwift.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2022 - Dec 2022":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 78.7% of the subpoenas received.<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 10% of the subpoenas we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 8.3% of the affected Dropbox users identified in subpoenas we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.&nbsp;<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jan 2022 - Jun 2022":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 77.2% of the subpoenas received.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 10.6% of the subpoenas we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 10.7% of the affected Dropbox users identified in subpoenas we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2021 - Dec 2021":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 81.1% of the subpoenas received.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 9.6% of the subpoenas we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 10.1% of the affected Dropbox users identified in subpoenas we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2021 - Jun 2021":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 86.4% of the subpoenas received.<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 12.4% of the subpoenas we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 21.2% of the affected Dropbox users identified in subpoenas we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2020 - Dec 2020":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 78.4% of the subpoenas received.<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 12.1% of the subpoenas we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 11.8% of the affected Dropbox users identified in subpoenas we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2020 - Jun 2020":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 80% of the subpoenas received.<br>\n<\/p>\n<p><br>\nWhen Dropbox complies with a search warrant, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 14% of the subpoenas we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 18.6% of the affected Dropbox users identified in subpoenas we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2019 - Dec 2019":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 75.4% of the subpoenas received.<\/p>\n<p><br>\nWhen Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 10.4% of the subpoenas we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 17.6% of the affected Dropbox users identified in subpoenas we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2019 - Jun 2019":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 76.1% of the subpoenas received.<\/p>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 8.2% of the subpoenas we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 13.3% of the affected Dropbox users identified in subpoenas we received of the fact that law enforcement requested for their information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2018 - Dec 2018":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n<p>We received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 8.2% of the subpoenas we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 13.3% of the Dropbox users named in a subpoena of the request for their information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2018 - Jun 2018":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 12.7% of the subpoenas we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 5.7% of the Dropbox users named in a subpoena of the request for their information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2017 - Dec 2017":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a subpoena for non-content, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n<p>Between July and December 2017, we received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 21% of the subpoenas we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 29.8% of the Dropbox users named in a subpoena of the request for their information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2017 - Jun 2017":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a subpoena for non-content, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n<p>Between January and June 2017, we received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 19.5% of the subpoenas we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 16.7% of the Dropbox users named in a subpoena of the request for their information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2016 - Dec 2016":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n<p>Between July and December 2016, we received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 16.1% of the subpoenas we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 20.9% of the Dropbox users named in a subpoena of the request for their information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2016 - Jun 2016":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n<p>Between January and June 2016, we received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 28.6% of the subpoenas we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 39.6% of the Dropbox users named in a subpoena of the request for their information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2015 - Dec 2015":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n","Jan 2015 - Jun 2015":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n","Jul 2014 - Dec 2014":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n","Jan 2014 - Jun 2014":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n","Jan 2013 - Dec 2013":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n","Jan 2012 - Dec 2012":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a subpoena, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n"}

{"Jul 2025 - Dec 2025":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 64.8% of the court orders we received.<\/p>\n<p>The number above includes court orders for all Dropbox products.&nbsp;<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jan 2025 - Jun 2025":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 62% of the court orders we received.<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 2% of the court orders we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 4% of the affected Dropbox users identified in court orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include court orders directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the first half of 2025, we received 1 court order directed to DocSend.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2024 - Dec 2024":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 91% of the court orders we received.<br>\n<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 2.3% of the court orders we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 1% of the affected Dropbox users identified in court orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n<p>In the second half of 2024, we did not receive any court orders directed at Dropbox subsidiaries.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jan 2024 - Jun 2024":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 52.9% of the court orders we received.<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 1.9% of the court orders we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 2.1% of the affected Dropbox users identified in court orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include court orders directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the first half of 2024, we did not receive any court orders directed at Dropbox subsidiaries.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2023 - Dec 2023":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 31.8% of the court orders we received.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 4.5% of the court orders we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 10.5% of the affected Dropbox users identified in court orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include court orders directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the relevant half, we did not receive any court order directed at Dropbox subsidiaries.<\/p>\n","Jan 2023 - Jun 2023":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 53.7% of the court orders we received.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 6% of the court orders we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 5.2% of the affected Dropbox users identified in court orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2022 - Dec 2022":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 46.3% of the court orders we received.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 7.4% of the court orders we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 13.6% of the affected Dropbox users identified in court orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2022 - Jun 2022":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 40.6% of the court orders we received.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 21.9% of the court orders we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 38.2% of the affected Dropbox users identified in court orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2021 - Dec 2021":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 55.3% of the court orders we received.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 7.9% of the court orders we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 20.7% of the affected Dropbox users identified in court orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2021 - Jun 2021":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 45.6% of the court orders we received.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 35.6% of the court orders we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 69.4% of the affected Dropbox users identified in court orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2020 - Dec 2020":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 38.3% of the court orders we received.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>When Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 45.7% of the court orders we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 50.3% of the affected Dropbox users identified in court orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2020 - Jun 2020":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 44.7% of the court orders received.<br>\n<\/p>\n<p><br>\nWhen Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 25.8% of the court orders we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 77.6% of the affected Dropbox users identified in court orders we received of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2019 - Dec 2019":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 47.8% of the court orders we received.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><br>\nWhen Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 25.4% of the court orders we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 29% of the affected Dropbox users identified in court orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2019 - Jun 2019":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We provided some information in response to 58.3% of the court orders we received.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice. 39.1% of the court orders we received were accompanied by court orders for non-disclosure of indefinite duration. These gag orders may prevent us from ever notifying 40.7% of the affected Dropbox users identified in court orders of the fact that law enforcement requested for their information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2018 - Dec 2018":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n<p>We received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 39.1% of the court orders we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 50% of the Dropbox users named in a court order of the request for their information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2018 - Jun 2018":"<h3>A note to provide context&nbsp;<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n<p>Between January and June 2018, we received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 12.5% of the court orders we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 2.1% of the Dropbox users named in a court order of the request for their information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2017 - Dec 2017":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n<p>Between July and December 2017, we received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 25% of the court orders we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 29.2% of the Dropbox users named in a court order of the request for their information.<\/p>\n<h3>&nbsp;<\/h3>\n","Jan 2017 - Jun 2017":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice, of the users whose non-content we provided to law enforcement.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Between January and June 2017, we received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 45.0% of the court orders we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 39.1% of the Dropbox users named in a court order of the request for their information.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2016 - Dec 2016":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a court order for non-content, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice, of the users whose non-content we provided to law enforcement.<\/p>\n<p>Between July and December 2016, we received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 42.9% of the court orders for non-content that we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 25.9% of the Dropbox users named in a court order of the request for their information.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jan 2016 - Jun 2016":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n<p>Between January and June 2016, we received indefinite court orders of non-disclosure for 83.3% of the court orders for non-content that we received. These court orders may prevent us from ever notifying 87.5% of the Dropbox users named in a court order of the request for their information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2015 - Dec 2015":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n","Jan 2015 - Jun 2015":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n","Jul 2014 - Dec 2014":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n","Jan 2012 - Dec 2012":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>Anytime Dropbox complies with a court order, we notify the users named in the request unless prohibited by law. The shaded portion of the pie chart above represents users to whom we gave notice.<\/p>\n"}

{"Jul 2025 - Dec 2025":"<p><b>A note about national security process<\/b><\/p>\n<p>National Security Letters are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service and local and long distance toll billing records\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jan 2025 - Jun 2025":"<p><b>A note about national security process<\/b><\/p>\n<p>National Security Letters are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service and local and long distance toll billing records\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2024 - Dec 2024":"<p><b>A note about national security process<\/b><\/p>\n<p>National Security Letters are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service and local and long distance toll billing records\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jan 2024 - Jun 2024":"<p><b>A note about national security process<\/b><\/p>\n<p>National Security Letters are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service and local and long distance toll billing records\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2023 - Dec 2023":"<p><b>A note about national security process<\/b><\/p>\n<p>National Security Letters are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service and local and long distance toll billing records\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jan 2023 - Jun 2023":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p>National Security Letters are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service and local and long distance toll billing records\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2022 - Dec 2022":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service and local and long distance toll billing records\u201d.<\/p>\n<p><b>Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2022 - Jun 2022":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service and local and long distance toll billing records\u201d.<\/p>\n<p><b>Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2021 - Dec 2021":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service and local and long distance toll billing records\u201d.<\/p>\n<p><b>Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2021 - Jun 2021":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service and local and long distance toll billing records\u201d.<\/p>\n<p><b>Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders&nbsp;<\/b>(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2020 - Dec 2020":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b> (\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service and local and long distance toll billing records\u201d.<\/p>\n<p><b>Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders<\/b> (\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jan 2020 - Jun 2020":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service and local and long distance toll billing records\u201d.<\/p>\n<p><b>Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2019 - Dec 2019":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b> (\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service and local and long distance toll billing records\u201d.<\/p>\n<p><br>\n<b>Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders<\/b> (\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2019 - Jun 2019":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters <\/b>(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service, and local and long distance toll billing records.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><b>Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders <\/b>(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2018 - Dec 2018":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters&nbsp;<\/b>(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service, and local and long distance toll billing records.<\/p>\n<p><b>\u201dForeign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders&nbsp;<\/b>(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2018 - Jun 2018":"<h3>A note about national security process<br>\n<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service, and local and long distance toll billing records.<\/p>\n<p><b>\u201dForeign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2017 - Dec 2017":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service, and local and long distance toll billing records.<\/p>\n<p><b>\u201dForeign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2017 - Jun 2017":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service, and local and long distance toll billing records.<\/p>\n<p><b>\u201dForeign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2016 - Dec 2016":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service, and local and long distance toll billing records.<\/p>\n<p><b>\u201dForeign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2016 - Jun 2016":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service, and local and long distance toll billing records.<\/p>\n<p><b>\u201dForeign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2015 - Dec 2015":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service, and local and long distance toll billing records.<\/p>\n<p><b>\u201dForeign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2015 - Jun 2015":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service, and local and long distance toll billing records.<\/p>\n<p><b>\u201dForeign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jul 2014 - Dec 2014":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service, and local and long distance toll billing records.<\/p>\n<p><b>\u201dForeign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2014 - Jun 2014":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service, and local and long distance toll billing records.<\/p>\n<p><b>\u201dForeign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2013 - Dec 2013":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service, and local and long distance toll billing records.<\/p>\n<p><b>\u201dForeign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n","Jan 2012 - Dec 2012":"<h3>A note about national security process<\/h3>\n<p><b>National Security Letters<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cNSLs\u201d) are requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for information relevant to a national security investigation. An NSL doesn\u2019t require a court order, but may only request a user\u2019s \u201cname, address, length of service, and local and long distance toll billing records.<\/p>\n<p><b>\u201dForeign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders<\/b>&nbsp;(\u201cFISA orders\u201d) are orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (\u201cFISC\u201d) for information relevant to a national security investigation. A FISA order may request a user\u2019s non-content and content information.<\/p>\n"}

{"Jul 2025 - Dec 2025":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We received 738 preservation requests from US law enforcement, affecting 855 accounts. We received 55 preservation requests from international law enforcement, affecting 67 accounts.<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include preservation requests for all Dropbox products. In the second half of 2025, we received three preservation requests for Dropbox Sign/Dropbox Fax and two preservation requests for Dropbox DocSend.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jan 2025 - Jun 2025":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We received 717 preservation requests from US law enforcement, affecting 768 accounts. We received 31 preservation requests from international law enforcement, affecting 35 accounts.<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include preservation requests directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the first half of 2025, we received 2 preservation requests directed to Dropbox Sign/Dropbox Fax.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2024 - Dec 2024":"<h3>A note to provide context<\/h3>\n<p>We received 877 preservation requests from US law enforcement, affecting 937 accounts. We received 67 preservation requests from international law enforcement, affecting 57 accounts.<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include preservation requests directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the second half of 2024, we received 3 preservation requests directed to Dropbox Sign/Dropbox Fax and 1 preservation request directed to DocSend.<\/p>\n","Jan 2024 - Jun 2024":"<p>We received 1,282 preservation requests from US law enforcement, affecting 1,352 accounts. We received 101 preservation requests from international law enforcement, affecting 236 accounts.<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include preservation requests directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the first half of 2024, we received 1 preservation request directed to Dropbox Sign/Dropbox Fax, and 1 preservation request directed to DocSend.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2023 - Dec 2023":"<p>We received 1323 preservation requests from U.S. law enforcement, affecting 1316 accounts. We received 92 preservation requests from international law enforcement, affecting 267 accounts.<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include preservation requests directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the relevant half, we received 1 preservation request directed to Dropbox Sign/Dropbox Fax, and 1 preservation request directed to DocSend.<\/p>\n","Jan 2023 - Jun 2023":"<p>We received 1,083 preservation requests from U.S. law enforcement, affecting 1,089 accounts. We received 97 preservation requests from international law enforcement, affecting 77 accounts.<\/p>\n<p>The numbers above include preservation requests directed at Dropbox subsidiaries. In the relevant half, we received 1 preservation request directed to DocSend.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2022 - Dec 2022":"<p>We received 1,034 preservation requests from U.S. law enforcement, affecting 1,056 accounts. We received 92 preservation requests from international law enforcement, affecting 52 accounts.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jan 2022 - Jun 2022":"<p>We received 1,427 preservation requests from U.S. law enforcement, affecting 1,349 accounts. We received 121 preservation requests from international law enforcement, affecting 106 accounts.<\/p>\n","Jul 2021 - Dec 2021":"<p>We received 1,238 preservation requests from U.S. law enforcement, affecting 1,172 accounts. We received 117 preservation requests from international law enforcement, affecting 110 accounts.<\/p>\n","Jan 2021 - Jun 2021":"<p>We received 1,255 preservation requests from U.S. law enforcement, affecting 1,408 accounts. We received 133 preservation requests from international law enforcement, affecting 119 accounts.<\/p>\n","Jul 2020 - Dec 2020":"<p>We received 841 preservation requests from U.S. law enforcement, affecting 1,041 accounts. We received 66 preservation requests from international law enforcement, affecting 73 accounts.<\/p>\n","Jan 2020 - Jun 2020":"<p>We received 888 preservation requests from U.S. law enforcement, affecting 1,153 accounts. We received 72 preservation requests from International law enforcement, affecting 86 accounts.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jul 2019 - Dec 2019":"<p>We received 695 preservation requests from U.S. law enforcement, affecting 800 accounts. We received 78 preservation requests from International law enforcement, affecting 104 accounts.<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jan 2019 - Jun 2019":"<p>Dropbox began reporting on Preservations in the second half of 2019.<\/p>\n"}

{}

{"Jul 2025 - Dec 2025":"<h3>A note to provide context - notice<\/h3>\n<p>The authorizing statute for PRTTs requires that such orders include a provision that prevents service providers like Dropbox from notifying users of these requests for an indefinite period of time. These gag orders may prevent Dropbox from ever notifying all of the affected Dropbox users identified in PRTT orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","Jan 2025 - Jun 2025":"<h3>A note to provide context - notice<\/h3>\n<p>The authorizing statute for PRTTs requires that such orders include a provision that prevents service providers like Dropbox from notifying users of these requests for an indefinite period of time. These gag orders may prevent Dropbox from ever notifying all of the affected Dropbox users identified in PRTT orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","Jul 2024 - Dec 2024":"<h3>A note to provide context - notice<\/h3>\n<p>The authorizing statute for PRTTs requires that such orders include a provision that prevents service providers like Dropbox from notifying users of these requests for an indefinite period of time. These gag orders may prevent Dropbox from ever notifying all of the affected Dropbox users identified in PRTT orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","Jan 2024 - Jun 2024":"<h3>A note to provide context - notice<\/h3>\n<p>The authorizing statute for PRTTs requires that such orders include a provision that prevents service providers like Dropbox from notifying users of these requests for an indefinite period of time. These gag orders may prevent Dropbox from ever notifying all of the affected Dropbox users identified in PRTT orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","Jul 2023 - Dec 2023":"<h3>A note to provide context - notice<\/h3>\n<p>The authorizing statute for PRTTs requires that such orders include a provision that prevents service providers like Dropbox from notifying users of these requests for an indefinite period of time. These gag orders may prevent Dropbox from ever notifying all of the affected Dropbox users identified in PRTT orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","Jan 2023 - Jun 2023":"<h3>A note to provide context - notice<\/h3>\n<p>The authorizing statute for PRTTs requires that such orders include a provision which prevents service providers like Dropbox from notifying users of these requests for an indefinite period of time. These gag orders may prevent Dropbox from ever notifying all of the affected Dropbox users identified in PRTT orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","Jul 2022 - Dec 2022":"<h3>A note to provide context - notice<\/h3>\n<p>The authorizing statute for PRTTs requires that such orders include a provision which prevents service providers like Dropbox from notifying users of these requests for an indefinite period of time. These gag orders may prevent Dropbox from ever notifying all of the affected Dropbox users identified in PRTT orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","Jan 2022 - Jun 2022":"<h3>A note to provide context - notice<\/h3>\n<p>The authorizing statute for PRTTs requires that such orders include a provision which prevents service providers like Dropbox from notifying users of these requests for an indefinite period of time. These gag orders may prevent Dropbox from ever notifying all of the affected Dropbox users identified in PRTT orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","Jul 2021 - Dec 2021":"<h3>A note to provide context - notice<\/h3>\n<p>The authorizing statute for PRTTs requires that such orders include a provision which prevents service providers like Dropbox from notifying users of these requests for an indefinite period of time. These gag orders may prevent Dropbox from ever notifying all of the affected Dropbox users identified in PRTT orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","Jan 2021 - Jun 2021":"<h3>A note to provide context - notice<\/h3>\n<p>The authorizing statute for PRTTs requires that such orders include a provision which prevents service providers like Dropbox from notifying users of these requests for an indefinite period of time. These gag orders may prevent Dropbox from ever notifying all of the affected Dropbox users identified in PRTT orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","Jul 2020 - Dec 2020":"<h3>A note to provide context - notice<\/h3>\n<p>The authorizing statute for PRTTs requires that such orders include a provision which prevents service providers like Dropbox from notifying users of these requests for an indefinite period of time. These gag orders may prevent Dropbox from ever notifying all of the affected Dropbox users identified in PRTT orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.&nbsp;<br>\n<\/p>\n","Jan 2017 - Jun 2017":"<h3>A note to provide context - notice<\/h3>\n<p>The authorizing statute for PRTTs requires that such orders include a provision which prevents service providers like Dropbox from notifying users of these requests for an indefinite period of time. These gag orders may prevent Dropbox from ever notifying all of the affected Dropbox users identified in PRTT orders of the fact that law enforcement requested their information.&nbsp;<br>\n<\/p>\n"}