Skip to content

Default pattern terminology to Pattern instead of Block Pattern#54708

Closed
felipevelzani wants to merge 5 commits intoWordPress:trunkfrom
felipevelzani:issue-49617
Closed

Default pattern terminology to Pattern instead of Block Pattern#54708
felipevelzani wants to merge 5 commits intoWordPress:trunkfrom
felipevelzani:issue-49617

Conversation

@felipevelzani
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What?

This PR replaces mentions of "Block Patterns" with "Patterns" only.

Fixes #49617.

Why?

There's an inconsistency in the labeling of the Patterns — sometimes it's "Pattern" while sometimes it's "Block Patterns" — and the goal would be to fix that.

How?

I mostly searched for the mentions of "Block Patterns" and replaced them manually based on the context.

Testing Instructions

Basically, a good step would be to search for mentions of patterns in the code and see if makes sense for these contexts.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the First-time Contributor Pull request opened by a first-time contributor to Gutenberg repository label Sep 22, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for your first Pull Request and for helping build the future of Gutenberg and WordPress, @foosantos! In case you missed it, we'd love to have you join us in our Slack community, where we hold regularly weekly meetings open to anyone to coordinate with each other.

If you want to learn more about WordPress development in general, check out the Core Handbook full of helpful information.

@felipevelzani felipevelzani added the [Type] Enhancement A suggestion for improvement. label Sep 22, 2023
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@draganescu draganescu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@t-hamano
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

t-hamano commented Nov 7, 2023

@foosantos

In order to merge this PR, could you rebase with the latest trunk just to be sure? If the GitHub Action fails, you'll probably need to fix that too. thank you!

@Mamaduka Mamaduka removed their request for review March 26, 2024 09:12
@ObliviousHarmony ObliviousHarmony removed their request for review August 26, 2024 21:26
@dcalhoun dcalhoun removed their request for review August 28, 2024 18:58
@Mamaduka
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Mamaduka commented Aug 4, 2025

It looks like PR has been stale for a while. Are there plans to continue working on this?

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2025

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Unlinked Accounts

The following contributors have not linked their GitHub and WordPress.org accounts: @xerpa43, @Narcos101.

Contributors, please read how to link your accounts to ensure your work is properly credited in WordPress releases.

If you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message.

Unlinked contributors: xerpa43, Narcos101.

Co-authored-by: foosantos <foosantos@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: richtabor <richtabor@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: draganescu <andraganescu@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: t-hamano <wildworks@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: Mamaduka <mamaduka@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: masteradhoc <masteradhoc@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: jordesign <jordesign@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: afercia <afercia@git.wordpress.org>

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

@noahtallen noahtallen removed their request for review August 5, 2025 19:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

First-time Contributor Pull request opened by a first-time contributor to Gutenberg repository [Type] Enhancement A suggestion for improvement.

5 participants