Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 61 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently

Requested RD1 redactions – No backlog currently

• 10xagency (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:40, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

  Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 06:40, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

• IdiotsavantAltofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "idiot" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:20, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

• AsterMarketing (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Promotional? 1" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:50, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

  Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 12:50, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

• TrollMan900 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:20, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

  This username matched "troll" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:20, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

  Note on file The word troll may imply an intent to disrupt Wikipedia - but that is not certain. Please use discretion to determine if this is a violation or not. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:20, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

• PonziCLub54 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:30, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

  Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 13:30, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

• FinlandballOfficialYT (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:10, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

  Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 01:10, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• Mikeyb official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:20, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

  Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 06:20, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• AlphaGoonTek (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 09:30, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

  This username matched "Used ph instead of f attempting to skip filter: fag. Violating string: alfagoontek" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 09:30, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• Pandamorontaiwan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "moron" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:40, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• Throwaway20260405 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "throw[- ]?away" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:50, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

  Note on file suggests throwaway account for one-time use -- DQB (owner / report) 17:50, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• Bullsheyt (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Obvious what they mean. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 06:09, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

  Wait until the user edits. Cullen328 (talk) 06:56, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• Bossmayhem (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and disruptive username. Impersonating (User:BossMayhem2509). MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 06:49, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
• SpaceMonkeysRebellion (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Name of a band. Has submitted a draft about the band. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

• Adam Lanza (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Daily unproductive editing from TAs which resumed almost immediately following the expiration of a month-long block imposed in late February. A repeated pattern is the unexplained removal of article content—one of the most common forms of vandalism—and the addition of unsourced/undue information. Realistically, I can't imagine a future where this page ceases being a target for childish trolls, given the sensitive subject matter at hand. The fact that no tin-foil hat has yet tried to insert their own agenda is a miracle, since as most of you reading this may know, Sandy Hook theories are unfortunately prominent in conspiracy spaces. Giovanni Potage (talk) 07:23, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• Sectarian violence against Sunni Arabs in Iraq (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism IP Always Change The Article Without Sources. Masare012 (talk) 10:33, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• Apsara (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: I request semi-protection for Apsara because there has been repeated removal of significant content by new users over the past month. Despite multiple reverts, the disruptive behavior continues.

Diffs of recent vandalism:

• [1]
• [2]
• [3]
• [4]

Semi-protection is requested to prevent further vandalism and preserve the integrity of the article. RaSriAiem (talk) 13:17, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• 2026 Pakistan Super League (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: The page 2026 Pakistan Super League has been targeted by frequent IP vandalism and occasionally receives unverified edits. Applying semi-protection will help maintain reliability and prevent disruptive changes. Elison Pokhrel (talk) 14:59, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• Michael Kovach (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 20:24, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:33, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated additions of unsourced statements (that belong on another article if at all) by non-autoconfirmed editors. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:26, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• Donald Trump (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection: Death rumors across multiple articles and sources will cause confusion, also can cause poor or unsourced edits. xxᴄʀᴏꜱꜱxx (talk) 22:11, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. No such rumors have been added to the article. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:16, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

And do note that we don't proactively protect pages. Pages are protected in response to unsourced content and vandalism. Not out of speculation that it will happen. Servite et contribuere (talk) 00:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Before posting a request for unprotection, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.

To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words "protected", "changed protection level", or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.

DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...

• ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
  • If you can edit the article's talk page, use the WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
  • If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
• ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
• ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
• ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.

You may request a protection reduction below if...

• ...you want to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
• ...you need to remove creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
• ...you are proposing a trial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years, provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
• ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.

If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.

Requests for specific edits should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.

• You may add the appropriate template ({{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}}) to the article's talk page if you would like to request an edit be made. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• For edit requests being made due to the editor having a conflict of interest with the article subject (see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used instead of the others listed above.
• Requests to move pages that are currently move-protected should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not on this page.
• This page is not for holding discussions regarding content.

Otherwise, if you are unable to add a request to the article's talk page, you may use this page to propose a specific edit to be performed. Vague requests that don't propose a specific edit will be declined. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.

• 2026 Iran war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

in the part that explains what us lost, change that the us had 5 KC-135 stratotankers damaged and 1 E3 awacs destroyed (https://www.airandspaceforces.com/us-forces-saudi-arabia-iran-attack/ and https://www.twz.com/air/images-purportedly-show-e-3-sentry-totally-destroyed-from-iranian-strike) first time editing a large page yay GalaxyHHDH (talk) 17:00, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.