Talk:Research

This  level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Education High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Invention High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Invention, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Invention on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InventionWikipedia:WikiProject InventionTemplate:WikiProject InventionInvention High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Open (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen Science Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology Science Policy Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives (Index)

2013 2014 2016 2017 2018 2019 2022

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

The content of Research ethics was merged into Research. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Research was copied or moved into Research ethics with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

I would argue that indigenous reseach methodologies needs to be added to this article, as a valid alternative to the european and andro-centric scientific method of research. One of the seminal works discussing the principles of indigenous research methods was authored by Cora Weber-Pillwax and published in the Journal of Educational Thought.^[1] Looking for some input as to in which section this belongs. Lavender is the new teal (talk) 20:29, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The removal of this section screwed up a [large number of wikilinks], which meant a job position. Reverted. --Altenmann >talk 19:39, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, there is a mix of terminology: Research fellow, Research associate, Research assistant. I have no idea where senior researcher fits better. From wikilinks it looks like it is an official job title not only in Russia.

Also, maybe "Researcher" be better off as a disambig page. --Altenmann >talk 19:44, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. in Template:TV production there is a link Researcher. I guess needs a separate text for this occupation and a tighter link: it looks like nothing fits well for it in the current generic "Research" article. --Altenmann >talk 19:48, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Fresh research has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 18 § Fresh research until a consensus is reached. Thepharoah17 (talk) 09:31, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]